7 (Para) RHA soldiers dismissed for sports drug use – there’s much more to this story says military solicitor

18 ‘Gunners’ from 7 (Para) Royal Horse Artillery who failed random drug testing at the end of August have been summarily dismissed by the Army.  The regiment, formed in 1961 and based at Merville Barracks Colchester provides offensive artillery fire support for 16th Air Assault Brigade.  The soldiers were found to have taken sports supplements containing banned substances and thus fell foul of the military’s zero tolerance approach to all recreational drug use.

Commenting on the news, Grant Evatt, Partner at Hilary Meredith Solicitors said:

“If the stories circulating are true  then this is in my opinion a major blow to the operational effectiveness of 7 RHA.  It is understood that  two of the 18 are Battery Sergeant Majors (BSM), the most senior non-commissioned officer in a gun battery.  The regiment has only three BSM’s.  Now it would seem they have just one. 18 happens also to be the number of troops required to man three 105mm Light Guns, the regiments main weapon.”

Appearing to be in support the 18 when this story broke, Col Richard Kemp, a former commander of British forces in Afghanistan said: “There is a strong culture of physical fitness in the Army, and there has to be. When a soldier is serving, they are carrying extremely heavy weights across difficult terrain for a long time and they have got to be in good physical shape. It is an extremely important part of their lives and in some ways, it is admirable that many soldiers will go above and beyond to get themselves in very good physical shape and taking this kind of substance is part of that fitness culture in the same way it is with civilian fitness fanatics.”

Continued Grant Evatt:

“Being dismissed this way will likely result in the soldiers losing their hard earned military pension, which is bound to cause serious hardship to each and every one and their families.  Their service records will be tainted for ever and a civilian employer may think twice before employing a soldier who has been dishonorably discharged. The welfare state will have to rehome and feed them.  Few soldiers save for such a rainy day.

“Say for arguments sake that all 18 were destined to serve a minimum of 22 years service.  They have lost, and the Treasury has saved, several hundred thousand pounds in salaries and commitment bonuses. Upon retirement they would each have been entitled to an annual index linked pension, the amount based upon years of reckonable service and rank upon discharge.  Some soldiers take it as a full or partial lump sum ‘gratuity’.  Ignoring the lump sums in these observations, if we take an average annual pension  of say £10,000  (a BSM gets just under £13,000 a year) and a life expectancy of a further 35 years, that’s a saving to the MOD budget of at least £6.3million!  Playing devils advocate, wouldn’t it be wiser to give each and every one a damn good ticking off and use just 1% of that money (£63,000) on better education for our troops upon what is clearly the harsh reality of the MOD’s approach? I would understand it if they were part of some gangster like drugs cartel dealing crystal meth around the barrack block, but we are talking of a group of ‘gym freaks’ but who have, according to the Army, committed an unforgivable offence.

“Personally I think there is much more to this story,” he concluded.

About Hilary Meredith Solicitors

Hilary Meredith Solicitors is a specialist military law firm based in London and Manchester.